Short Answer
This view holds that using preferred pronouns would affirm something believed to be untrue, so it should be avoided. At the same time, believers are called to treat people with respect, even when they disagree.
The Overview
The issue of pronouns is often framed as a question of truth versus affirmation. In this perspective, gender identity is understood as fixed and rooted in biological reality. Therefore, using pronouns that contradict that reality is seen as participating in something untrue. Because of this, the conclusion is to avoid using such pronouns.
However, this does not remove the responsibility to treat others with dignity. Even when there is disagreement, communication should remain respectful and calm. The goal is not to provoke or offend unnecessarily, but to engage honestly without compromising personal convictions.
In practical terms, this may require wisdom in how conversations are handled. Some may choose to avoid pronouns altogether in order to maintain both clarity and kindness. Others may accept that disagreement could limit certain interactions. Each situation may call for careful judgment about how to balance truth and relationship.
Ultimately, the tension lies between conviction and compassion. Holding to one’s beliefs about truth while still demonstrating kindness, patience, and respect is the challenge. How that is lived out may vary, but both elements are important.
Key Takeaways
- Truth Matters
Some see pronoun use as affirming something untrue. - Respect Is Still Required
Disagreement should not lead to harshness. - Wisdom in Communication
Different situations may require different approaches. - Avoid Unnecessary Conflict
Seek peaceful interaction where possible. - Balance Conviction and Compassion
Hold beliefs while showing kindness. - Practical Solutions Exist
Some choose neutral language to navigate tension.
Read Full Raw Transcript
[00:00:00 – 00:00:48] All right, I’ll squeeze in one last one here. Ann asked, “Is it a sin to call transgendered people by their preferred pronouns?” Uh, and are you confident in your answer or is the best guess? Yes, I would not um call a transgender person by their pronouns. Uh, if they’re going to get all hot and bothered, then I guess we’re not going to have a conversation. But I don’t want to engage in someone else’s uh delusion because that’s what it is. It’s not truth. It’s
[00:00:23 – 00:01:26] not fact. And uh therefore um I want to be respectful but it does not mean I’m going to accept or engage in their um their lie cuz that’s what it is. And I know that hacks people off and I’m sorry I guess. No, I’m not. I don’t know. Sorry, not sorry. But there’s the reality of answering that question quickly. And we can talk more about it. Call me back tomorrow. Lord willing. I’ll be here tomorrow if the creek don’t rise and we’ll be talking about uh what it is that is on your mind. So, thanks
